Monday, November 10, 2008
Survey
So today I was taking pictures of Prada all snuggled up on my bed, well, because she looked really cute. The Garbage Disposal asked how many pictures I had on my camera of her and said it's weird that I have so many pictures of her. (There's a lot) So I'm asking you, how many pictures is too many of your family pet? I know none of you currently have a family pet (Coach I'm counting on you to back me up on this), but if you did, would you take pictures?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
I have attempted at least five pictures of our family pets, Violet Beauregard and Charlie Bucket (Shortcake's beta fish). They did not turn out well.
When I had pets growing up and I had a camera handy I would always take pictures of them, particulary my dog Cody. He was a wild banshee of a dog, yes, and he and The General had a true hate-hate relationship. But I loved that animal and thought he was the cutest canine that ever lived.
The line for excessivness? I'd say if you have more than 250 pictures of your dog than you might want to think about getting a hobby. Or a kid.
on my cell phone alone (which i've had for only a few months) has 7 pictures of angel on it....i would wager to say my camera has at least 25 and already downloaded on my computer another 25 easy....the kicker, not even my cat.....hows that for backin you up kid
-coach
thanks coach i knew i could count on you...
i don't think i have 250, but i won't lie, it's probably close to 75-100
If you go over 100, get a hobby, but not a kid.
i 2nd the not a kid motion
i counted, there are 37, one of which is a video...
feel free to judge me off of that
The true test as to whether it's pathetic or not is if you actually consider your dog your child. Kate sure likes to do that, and refers to her two cats as "the boys", and always has new pictures to show us when we see her. So, as long as you're not doing that, you're fine.
I should also mention that they are getting a dog tomorrow. Crazy people.
Post a Comment